Which philosophical perspective would focus on the end results of actions rather than their ideals?

The focus of the correct answer is on the consequences of actions rather than adhering to specific ideals or moral principles. This aligns with the principles of pragmatism, which emphasizes evaluating ideas and actions based on their practical applications and outcomes in real-world scenarios. Pragmatism suggests that the truth of beliefs or theories is determined by their effectiveness and utility in achieving desired results.

In the context of moral philosophy, pragmatism allows for flexibility in decision-making, adapting to changing circumstances and focusing on what works best in a given situation. This prospective ensures that rather than rigidly adhering to a set of ideals, one considers how the actions taken will yield beneficial results.

In contrast, idealism emphasizes adherence to a set of ethical ideals or principles regardless of the outcomes. Realism typically pertains to a more objective perspective that acknowledges the world's complexities but does not emphasize outcome-oriented thinking. Utilitarianism, while also concerned with outcomes, specifically focuses on maximizing overall happiness or utility, but it is distinct from pragmatism in that it does adhere to a defined moral principle (the greatest happiness) rather than being open to varying measures of success depending on context. Thus, while utilitarianism may also prioritize results, pragmatism takes a broader, more adaptable approach.