Which perspective of legal idealism would be most supportive of protecting individual rights?

Interpretative jurisprudence is focused on the meanings and principles of the law beyond just the literal text. This perspective holds that the law should be understood in the context of its broader purposes, which often includes a commitment to protecting individual rights and advancing justice. By interpreting laws in light of their social, political, and historical contexts, this approach allows for a more flexible application of legal norms that can adapt to protect individual freedoms and rights, acknowledging the changing societal values and principles of justice.

In contrast, originalism tends to focus strictly on the intent of the framers of the law or the Constitution, which may not always align with contemporary understandings of individual rights. Textualism prioritizes the literal meaning of the text, potentially overlooking implications for individual rights if they are not explicitly stated. Legal formalism emphasizes a rigid application of laws as written, which may also neglect the evolving interpretation necessary to safeguard individual rights.