What concept suggests that law should act as a mirror of universal human ethics?

The concept that suggests law should act as a mirror of universal human ethics is known as Legal Naturalism. This philosophical viewpoint posits that there are inherent moral principles that are universally applicable and that legal systems should reflect these ethical standards. Legal naturalists believe that laws derive their legitimacy from their alignment with moral reasoning; therefore, if a law contradicts fundamental ethical principles, it may be deemed unjust or illegitimate.

In contrast, Legal Positivism focuses on the idea that laws are valid not because they align with moral principles but because they are enacted by recognized authorities and meet certain criteria of governance. Legal Pragmatism emphasizes practical outcomes and the effectiveness of laws rather than their moral underpinnings. Legal Paternalism involves legislating for the well-being of individuals, even against their will, highlighting the state's role in protecting citizens, which does not necessarily align with the idea of universal human ethics.

Thus, Legal Naturalism aligns closely with the notion of laws reflecting universal ethics, emphasizing the necessary relationship between morality and legality.