The topic of physician-assisted suicide is fundamentally rooted in moral questions about the value of life, autonomy, and the ethical implications of intentionally ending a life. These discussions often revolve around deeply held beliefs about what is right or wrong, the role of individual choice, and interpretations of suffering and dignity. Consequently, the debates over physician-assisted suicide are primarily categorized as morality issues because they involve ethical considerations and personal values that affect how individuals and society perceive death and autonomy.
While legal frameworks and political implications engage with physician-assisted suicide—such as laws governing its practice and the influence of public policy—these aspects stem from the underlying moral debates. The economic dimension, while it may play a role in the broader conversation (concerning healthcare costs or resource allocation), does not drive the main discussions surrounding the ethics of ending life in a medical context. Thus, the centrality of ethical considerations surrounding personal choice and the sanctity of life makes this a morality issue.